TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND RADIO ENGINEERING - 2009 Vol. 68,
No 8
 

 

 

 

Performance Comparison of Adaptive Linear Equalized and Adaptive MMSE-DFE

Saniay Kumar Sharma
Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engg, Krishna Institute of Engg. and Technology, 13 KM stone, Ghaziabad-Meerut Road, Ghaziabad-201206, India

S. Naseem Ahmad
Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engg, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi-110025, India

Abstract
The paper compares the performance of an adaptive linear equalizer and adaptive MMSE DFE. In mobile communication, intersymbol interference (ISI) caused by multipath in bandlimited (frequency selective) time dispersive channels distorts the transmitted signal, causing bit errors at the receiver. ISI has been recognized as the major obstacle to high-speed data transmission over wireless channels. Equalization is a technique used to combat ISI. Linear adaptive equalizers do not perform well on channels, which have deep spectral nulls in the passband. As a more powerful receiver algorithm, we prefer a decision feedback equalizer (DFE), which has better immunity against the spectral channel characteristics. In the paper, we have investigated various adaptive equalizers using the recursive least-squares (RLS) algorithm for wireless communication systems. In that regard, both linear equalizer and non-linear DFE with RLS algorithm have been examined in multipath fading channel model. We have also examined the influence of some important parameters, such as a tap number of the adaptive equalizers, and forgetting factor of the algorithm. Simulation results show that DFE perform much better than adaptive linear equalizer. Further the theoretical results have also been verified through computer simulations.

References

  1. Emory A Griffin, (1997), A first look at communication theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  2. Haykin, S., (2002), Adaptive Filter Theory, Prentice Hall.
  3. Shannon, C.E., (1948), A mathematical theory of communication, Bell system Technical Journal, 27.
  4. John, G., and Proakis, (2001), Digital Communication, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  5. William, McC, (1986), Siebert, Circuits, Signals, and Systems, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  6. Rappaport, T.S., (1996), Wireless communications, Chapter 3 and 4, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  7. Coon, J., Armour, S., Beach, M., and McGeehan, J., (2005), Adaptive frequency-domain equalization for single-carrier multiple input-multiple-output wireless transmissions, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 53(8):3247-3256.
  8. Bottomed, G.E., Ottosson, T., and Wang, Y.E., (2000), A generalized RAKE receiver for interference suppression, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 18(8):1536-1545.
  9. Proakis, J., (1991), Adaptive Equalization for TDMA Digital Mobile Radio, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 40(2):333-341.
  10. TS 25.213 3GPP TSG RAN, V. 5.2.0, Spreading and Modulation (FDD), 2002-09.
  11. Lee, Y., and Cox, D.C., (1998), MAP Selection Diversity DFE and Indoor Wireless Data Communication, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 16(8).
  12. Brady, D.M., (1970), An Adaptive Coherent Diversity Receiver for Data Transmission through Dispersive Media, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp.21-35.
  13. Monsen, P., (1984), MMSE equalization of interference on fading diversity channels, IEEE Trans. Commun. COM-32:5-12.


pages 697-708

Back